Register to unlock your exclusive B2B prices and start shopping. Sign up now!
LF1300RGBW-G1-865-04 V2 image 1

LF1300RGBW-G1-865-04 V2

In stock: No Vendor stock: No Minimal order quantity: 1 Discontinued
Price (excl. VAT):
364,85 €
This price is valid until 31.08.25
Split box: 10,00 €
EAN: 4062172166232
MPN: 4062172166232
Package: 1
Box: 8
Estimate delivery time at our warehouse (approx.): 2-4 weeks

Technical Information

Item condition New
Manufacture name LF1300RGBW-G1-865-04 V2
Brand OSRAM
Categories Light ribbon-/hose/-strip
Country of origin CN

Packing details

Packing level 1 4062172166232
Packing level 2 4062172166232

Description

LF1300RGBW-G1-865-04 V2. RGBW light strip for dynamic ambient lighting or architectural installs. Integrated into multi-channel systems for controlled color mixes and white tone adjustments. Uses 24V DC input, current draw depends on segment setup but max rating near ~12W/m output fluctuation with density (1300 LEDs/strip). Cut points at intervals (~50mm), modular wiring necessary, needs controller compatibility to access RGB+white modes. Heat dissipation advised for extended operation—aluminum profile mount recommended. Physical dimensions approx. 13mm width, adhesive backing pre-applied: short-term stickiness subject to prep quality substrate texture matters (clean/dry ideal). IP65 rated sealed casing tolerates moisture/surface dust not submerged use — double-check resist resilience if outdoor install planned. Raw notes: LED count/m = 1300 pcs, voltage = 24V DC, typical power consumption ~12 W/m, cut spacing = ~50 mm intervals, rating IP65 = light water-resistant only, dimensions approximately 13 mm x strip length variable yards/meters avail flexible trim/cut capable system interconnect required, operating temperature range -20°C to +40°C performance dips noted in extremes durability risk outdoors correction needed w/o protections over time exposure update testing pending firmware/controller pairs drivers matter more failures observed generic drop-in pls matched setup preferred risks noise/errors result less stable blends end doc timing cross-check requested continued observations follow-up?